Filters
Clonality
Type
Reactivity
Gene Name
Isotype
Host
Application
Clone
162 results for "Cytokine" - showing 150-162
FCM (Flow Cytometry)
(Dual staining of pig peripheral blood lymphocytes with Mouse anti Pig CD335 detected with Goat anti Mouse IgG (H/L):FITC (STAR117F), and Mouse anti Pig wCD8a:RPE)
CD335, Monoclonal Antibody (Cat# AAA12251)
Full Name
MOUSE ANTI PIG CD335: APC
Reactivity
Pig
Applications
FC/FACS
Pricing
IHC (Immunohistochemistry)
(At 1/100 staining Mouse kidney tissue by IHC-P. The sample was formaldehyde fixed and a heat mediated antigen retrieval step in citrate buffer was performed. The sample was then blocked and incubated with the primary antibody at 4 degree C overnight. An HRP conjugated anti-Rabbit antibody was used as the secondary antibody.)
p38 MAPK, Polyclonal Antibody (Cat# AAA31333)
Full Name
Phospho-p38 MAPK (Thr180/Tyr182) Antibody
Gene Names
MAPK14; RK; p38; CSBP; EXIP; Mxi2; CSBP1; CSBP2; CSPB1; PRKM14; PRKM15; SAPK2A; p38ALPHA
Reactivity
Human, Mouse, Rat
Predicted Reactivity: Pig (100%), Bovine (100%), Horse (100%), Sheep (100%), Rabbit (100%), Dog (100%), Xenopus (91%)
Predicted Reactivity: Pig (100%), Bovine (100%), Horse (100%), Sheep (100%), Rabbit (100%), Dog (100%), Xenopus (91%)
Applications
WB, IHC, IF, ICC, IP, EIA
Purity
The antibody is from purified rabbit serum by affinity purification via sequential chromatography on phospho-peptide and non-phospho-peptide affinity columns.
Pricing
FCM (Flow Cytometry)
(Dual staining of pig peripheral blood lymphocytes with Mouse anti Pig CD335 detected with Goat anti Mouse IgG (H/L):FITC (STAR117F), and Mouse anti Pig wCD8a:RPE)
CD335, Monoclonal Antibody (Cat# AAA12253)
Full Name
MOUSE ANTI PIG CD335
Reactivity
Pig
Applications
FC, IF
Pricing
Application Data
(Published customer image: Leukocyte infiltration in COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ mice. MPO enzymatic activity (panel A) was statistically similar in COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ livers at 6 h and 24 h post-IRI. Ly-6G+ neutrophil (panel B) and granulocyte (panel C) infiltration were also comparable in COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ livers after IRI. Mac-1+ (panel D) and CD68 (panel E) infiltrating macrophages were significantly reduced in COX-2-M/-M livers at 24 h post-reperfusion, but were statistically indistinguishable in COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ livers at 6 h after IRI. No statistical differences in MMP-9 expression (panel F) could be demonstrated in livers of COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ mice post-IRI. Representative immunostaining (panel G) of infiltrating Ly-6G+ (a,b,e,f) and Mac-1+ (c,d,g,h) leukocytes in livers of COX-2+/+ (a,c,e,g) and COX-2-M/-M (b,d,f,h) mice at 6 h (a to d) and 24 h (e to h) post IRI; (n = 5 -6/group; * indicates p)
CD68, Monoclonal Antibody (Cat# AAA12105)
Full Name
RAT ANTI MOUSE CD68:FITC
Gene Names
Cd68; Lamp4; gp110; Scard1
Applications
FC/FACS
Pricing
Application Data
(Published customer image: Leukocyte infiltration in COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ mice. MPO enzymatic activity (panel A) was statistically similar in COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ livers at 6 h and 24 h post-IRI. Ly-6G+ neutrophil (panel B) and granulocyte (panel C) infiltration were also comparable in COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ livers after IRI. Mac-1+ (panel D) and CD68 (panel E) infiltrating macrophages were significantly reduced in COX-2-M/-M livers at 24 h post-reperfusion, but were statistically indistinguishable in COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ livers at 6 h after IRI. No statistical differences in MMP-9 expression (panel F) could be demonstrated in livers of COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ mice post-IRI. Representative immunostaining (panel G) of infiltrating Ly-6G+ (a,b,e,f) and Mac-1+ (c,d,g,h) leukocytes in livers of COX-2+/+ (a,c,e,g) and COX-2-M/-M (b,d,f,h) mice at 6 h (a to d) and 24 h (e to h) post IRI; (n = 5 -6/group; * indicates p)
CD68, Monoclonal Antibody (Cat# AAA12104)
Full Name
RAT ANTI MOUSE CD68:Biotin
Gene Names
Cd68; Lamp4; gp110; Scard1
Applications
FC/FACS
Pricing
Application Data
(Published customer image: Leukocyte infiltration in COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ mice. MPO enzymatic activity (panel A) was statistically similar in COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ livers at 6 h and 24 h post-IRI. Ly-6G+ neutrophil (panel B) and granulocyte (panel C) infiltration were also comparable in COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ livers after IRI. Mac-1+ (panel D) and CD68 (panel E) infiltrating macrophages were significantly reduced in COX-2-M/-M livers at 24 h post-reperfusion, but were statistically indistinguishable in COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ livers at 6 h after IRI. No statistical differences in MMP-9 expression (panel F) could be demonstrated in livers of COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ mice post-IRI. Representative immunostaining (panel G) of infiltrating Ly-6G+ (a,b,e,f) and Mac-1+ (c,d,g,h) leukocytes in livers of COX-2+/+ (a,c,e,g) and COX-2-M/-M (b,d,f,h) mice at 6 h (a to d) and 24 h (e to h) post IRI; (n = 5 -6/group; * indicates p)
CD68, Monoclonal Antibody (Cat# AAA12108)
Full Name
RAT ANTI MOUSE CD68:RPE
Gene Names
Cd68; Lamp4; gp110; Scard1
Applications
FC/FACS
Pricing
Application Data
(Published customer image: Leukocyte infiltration in COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ mice. MPO enzymatic activity (panel A) was statistically similar in COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ livers at 6 h and 24 h post-IRI. Ly-6G+ neutrophil (panel B) and granulocyte (panel C) infiltration were also comparable in COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ livers after IRI. Mac-1+ (panel D) and CD68 (panel E) infiltrating macrophages were significantly reduced in COX-2-M/-M livers at 24 h post-reperfusion, but were statistically indistinguishable in COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ livers at 6 h after IRI. No statistical differences in MMP-9 expression (panel F) could be demonstrated in livers of COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ mice post-IRI. Representative immunostaining (panel G) of infiltrating Ly-6G+ (a,b,e,f) and Mac-1+ (c,d,g,h) leukocytes in livers of COX-2+/+ (a,c,e,g) and COX-2-M/-M (b,d,f,h) mice at 6 h (a to d) and 24 h (e to h) post IRI; (n = 5 -6/group; * indicates p)
CD68, Monoclonal Antibody (Cat# AAA12109)
Full Name
RAT ANTI MOUSE CD68:RPE
Gene Names
Cd68; Lamp4; gp110; Scard1
Applications
FC/FACS
Pricing
Application Data
(Published customer image: Leukocyte infiltration in COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ mice. MPO enzymatic activity (panel A) was statistically similar in COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ livers at 6 h and 24 h post-IRI. Ly-6G+ neutrophil (panel B) and granulocyte (panel C) infiltration were also comparable in COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ livers after IRI. Mac-1+ (panel D) and CD68 (panel E) infiltrating macrophages were significantly reduced in COX-2-M/-M livers at 24 h post-reperfusion, but were statistically indistinguishable in COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ livers at 6 h after IRI. No statistical differences in MMP-9 expression (panel F) could be demonstrated in livers of COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ mice post-IRI. Representative immunostaining (panel G) of infiltrating Ly-6G+ (a,b,e,f) and Mac-1+ (c,d,g,h) leukocytes in livers of COX-2+/+ (a,c,e,g) and COX-2-M/-M (b,d,f,h) mice at 6 h (a to d) and 24 h (e to h) post IRI; (n = 5 -6/group; * indicates p)
CD68, Monoclonal Antibody (Cat# AAA12102)
Full Name
RAT ANTI MOUSE CD68
Gene Names
Cd68; Lamp4; gp110; Scard1
Applications
FC/FACS, IF, IP, WB
Pricing
Application Data
(Published customer image: Leukocyte infiltration in COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ mice. MPO enzymatic activity (panel A) was statistically similar in COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ livers at 6 h and 24 h post-IRI. Ly-6G+ neutrophil (panel B) and granulocyte (panel C) infiltration were also comparable in COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ livers after IRI. Mac-1+ (panel D) and CD68 (panel E) infiltrating macrophages were significantly reduced in COX-2-M/-M livers at 24 h post-reperfusion, but were statistically indistinguishable in COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ livers at 6 h after IRI. No statistical differences in MMP-9 expression (panel F) could be demonstrated in livers of COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ mice post-IRI. Representative immunostaining (panel G) of infiltrating Ly-6G+ (a,b,e,f) and Mac-1+ (c,d,g,h) leukocytes in livers of COX-2+/+ (a,c,e,g) and COX-2-M/-M (b,d,f,h) mice at 6 h (a to d) and 24 h (e to h) post IRI; (n = 5 -6/group; * indicates p)
CD68, Monoclonal Antibody (Cat# AAA12106)
Full Name
RAT ANTI MOUSE CD68:FITC
Gene Names
Cd68; Lamp4; gp110; Scard1
Applications
FC/FACS
Pricing
Application Data
(Published customer image: Leukocyte infiltration in COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ mice. MPO enzymatic activity (panel A) was statistically similar in COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ livers at 6 h and 24 h post-IRI. Ly-6G+ neutrophil (panel B) and granulocyte (panel C) infiltration were also comparable in COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ livers after IRI. Mac-1+ (panel D) and CD68 (panel E) infiltrating macrophages were significantly reduced in COX-2-M/-M livers at 24 h post-reperfusion, but were statistically indistinguishable in COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ livers at 6 h after IRI. No statistical differences in MMP-9 expression (panel F) could be demonstrated in livers of COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ mice post-IRI. Representative immunostaining (panel G) of infiltrating Ly-6G+ (a,b,e,f) and Mac-1+ (c,d,g,h) leukocytes in livers of COX-2+/+ (a,c,e,g) and COX-2-M/-M (b,d,f,h) mice at 6 h (a to d) and 24 h (e to h) post IRI; (n = 5 -6/group; * indicates p)
CD68, Monoclonal Antibody (Cat# AAA12103)
Full Name
RAT ANTI MOUSE CD68:Biotin
Gene Names
Cd68; Lamp4; gp110; Scard1
Applications
FC/FACS
Pricing
Application Data
(Published customer image: Leukocyte infiltration in COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ mice. MPO enzymatic activity (panel A) was statistically similar in COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ livers at 6 h and 24 h post-IRI. Ly-6G+ neutrophil (panel B) and granulocyte (panel C) infiltration were also comparable in COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ livers after IRI. Mac-1+ (panel D) and CD68 (panel E) infiltrating macrophages were significantly reduced in COX-2-M/-M livers at 24 h post-reperfusion, but were statistically indistinguishable in COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ livers at 6 h after IRI. No statistical differences in MMP-9 expression (panel F) could be demonstrated in livers of COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ mice post-IRI. Representative immunostaining (panel G) of infiltrating Ly-6G+ (a,b,e,f) and Mac-1+ (c,d,g,h) leukocytes in livers of COX-2+/+ (a,c,e,g) and COX-2-M/-M (b,d,f,h) mice at 6 h (a to d) and 24 h (e to h) post IRI; (n = 5 -6/group; * indicates p)
CD68, Monoclonal Antibody (Cat# AAA12107)
Full Name
RAT ANTI MOUSE CD68
Gene Names
Cd68; Lamp4; gp110; Scard1
Applications
FC/FACS, IF, IP, WB
Purity
Purified
Purified IgG - liquid
Purified IgG - liquid
Pricing
Application Data
(Published customer image: Leukocyte infiltration in COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ mice. MPO enzymatic activity (panel A) was statistically similar in COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ livers at 6 h and 24 h post-IRI. Ly-6G+ neutrophil (panel B) and granulocyte (panel C) infiltration were also comparable in COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ livers after IRI. Mac-1+ (panel D) and CD68 (panel E) infiltrating macrophages were significantly reduced in COX-2-M/-M livers at 24 h post-reperfusion, but were statistically indistinguishable in COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ livers at 6 h after IRI. No statistical differences in MMP-9 expression (panel F) could be demonstrated in livers of COX-2-M/-M and COX-2+/+ mice post-IRI. Representative immunostaining (panel G) of infiltrating Ly-6G+ (a,b,e,f) and Mac-1+ (c,d,g,h) leukocytes in livers of COX-2+/+ (a,c,e,g) and COX-2-M/-M (b,d,f,h) mice at 6 h (a to d) and 24 h (e to h) post IRI; (n = 5 -6/group; * indicates p)
CD68, Monoclonal Antibody (Cat# AAA12110)
Full Name
RAT ANTI MOUSE CD68
Gene Names
Cd68; Lamp4; gp110; Scard1
Applications
FC, IA, IF, IP, WB
Pricing
